An Approach to Develop an Engineering Employability Skill Framework: A Methodological Proposal Based on Quantitative Study

Authors

  • Amarjit Singh Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Azrul Fazwan Kharuddin Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Zaida Mustafa Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Keywords:

employability skill, quantitative approach, design and development research, methodological strategy

Abstract

Purpose of the study is to identify what are the relevant research activities in investigating engineering employability skills for Malaysian engineering graduates using the Design and Development Research (DDR) through the Malaysian Engineering Employability Skills (MEES). This article finds the issues of research method development comprise of philosophical research, approach, design and strategy inside the field of prospects contemplates. The article dissects orderly methodology for fostering an exploration philosophy in engineering education – the "research onion" model and inspects the pertinence and propriety of this model for possibilities considers.

References

Bodjanova, S. (2006). Median alpha-levels of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(7), 879-891.

Chandel, K., Kunwar, V., Sabitha, S., Choudhury, T., & Mukherjee, S. (2016). A comparative study on thyroid disease detection using K-nearest neighbor and Naive Bayes classification techniques. CSI transactions on ICT, 4(2-4), 313-319. 10

Cox, J., & Cox, K. B. (2008). Your opinion, please! How to build the best questionnaires in the field of education. Corwin Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). A framework for design. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 9-11.

Creswell, J., Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2002). Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs. A.

Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie Handbook Of Mixed Methods In Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 210-226). Department of Statistics Malaysia (2020), Ministry of Education Statistics, Department of Statistics Malaysia, Putrajaya

Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: how can it be assessed? Jama, 260(12), 1743-1748.

Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications.

Gay, G. (1986). Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. Journal of educational psychology, 78(3), 225.

Gay, L., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle

River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Goleman, D.(1998). What makes a leader. Harvard Business Review, 76(6).

Green, D. O., Creswell, J. W., Shope, R. J., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Grounded theory and racial/ethnic diversity. The Sage handbook of grounded theory, (Part V), 472-92.

Hanasyha, J. (2016). Testing the Effects of Employee Empowerment, Teamwork, and Employee Training on Employee Productivity in Higher Education Sector. International Journal of Learning and Development, 6(1), 164–178

Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.

Kaplan, B. (2001). Evaluating informatics applications—some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. International journal of medical informatics, 64(1), 39-56.

Klien, J. D., & Richey, R. C. (2007). Design and Development Research Method, strategies, and Issue.

Knight, R. A., & Sims‐Knight, J. E. (2003). The developmental antecedents of sexual coercion against women: Testing alternative hypotheses with structural equation modeling. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 72-85.

Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of populations: methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational researcher, 18(2), 5-11.

Poth, C. N. (2019). Rigorous and ethical qualitative data reuse: Potential perils and promising practices.

Robertson, C. T., & Kesselheim, A. S. (Eds.). (2016). Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law. Academic Press.

Sin, C., Tavares, O., & Amaral, A. (2016). Who is responsible for employability? Student perceptions and practices. Tertiary Education and Management, 22(1), 65-81.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. sage.

Stewart, M. A. (1995). Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ: Canadian medical association journal, 152(9), 1423.

Subiyakto, A. A., Ahlan, A. R., Putra, S. J., & Kartiwi, M. (2015). Validation of information system project success model: A focus group study. SAGE Open, 5(2), 2158244015581650.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.

Tejan, O. A., & Sabil, A. (2019). Understanding employers’ perception of employability skills and career development in Morocco. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(2), 134-138.

Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (2013). Educational research: A guide to the process. Routledge.

Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic commerce research and applications, 9(6), 476-487.

Wu, D., & Tan, W. W. (2006). Genetic learning and performance evaluation of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 19(8), 829-841

Zaharim, A., Yusoff, Y., Omar, M. Z., Mohamed, A., & Muhamad, N. (2009, July). Engineering employability skills required by employers in Asia. In Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS international conference on Engineering education (Vol. 1, pp. 194-201).

Downloads

Published

31-12-2021

Issue

Section

Articles