It’s the company you keep that matters: A study on effects of friends and mentor on opportunity recognition
Keywords:
Opportunity recognition, MentorAbstract
Purpose - the purpose of this study is to examine the relationships of social networks and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition of small technology firms in Malaysia. The study seeks to explore the gaps between the practice of mentoring in technology start up firms. Design/methodology/approach – this paper employs a quantitative research design involving selfreporting questionnaires. Founders and co-founders of technology companies (n=255) are surveyed as respondents and data collected are analyzed using PLS-SEM technique. Findings – Findings have shown that both casual friends and mentors affect the entrepreneur’s ability to recognize opportunity but each in its different ways. Entrepreneurs who possess wider social contacts benefits from a wide array of information which plays a key role to opportunity previously not recognized either due to lack of information or resources to exploit. Mentors, on the other hand, influence the entrepreneur’s ability to recognize opportunity through the preparation of the mind in a state of readiness to recognize opportunities. To identify opportunities, a weak tie network is best suited to spark the imagination of the entrepreneur in novel ideas. Practical implications – From a more practical standpoint, the use of mentorship programs in entrepreneurial and incubation initiatives needs to be clear on the expected role and outcome for the mentor. Without a doubt, mentors play an important role in the maturing process of a novice entrepreneur but the key to effective mentorship is the ‘how’ the mentors' influence. Originality/value – The clear delineation of the opportunity construct within the entrepreneurship studies enables progress to be made in building a clearer opportunity recognition framework. The empirical results are also supporting the presence of entrepreneurial alertness as the mediator in the model. This relationship has not been explored and empirically proven.
References
Ali, H. and Mohammadreza, Z., 2016. Prior knowledge, cognitive characteristics and opportunity recognition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(1), pp.63-83.
Arenius, P. and De Clercq, D., 2005. A network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small business economics, 24(3), pp.249-265.
Baron, R.A., 2006. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of management perspectives, 20(1), pp.104-119.
Baron, R.A. and Ensley, M.D., 2006. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management science, 52(9), pp.1331- 1344.
Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Van Tilburg, A. and Van De Bunt, G.G., 2010. How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), pp.245-260.
Cohen, J., 1992. A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), p.155. Edelman, L. and Yli–Renko, H., 2010. The impact of environment and entrepreneurial perceptions on venturecreation efforts: Bridging the discovery and creation views of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), pp.833-856.
Elfring, T. and Hulsink, W., 2003. Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small business economics, 21(4), pp.409-422.
Fornell, C. and Larker, D., 1981. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39-50.
Gaglio, C.M. and Katz, J.A., 2001. The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small business economics, 16(2), pp.95-111.
Gaglio, C.M. and Winter, S., 2017. Entrepreneurial Alertness and Opportunity Identification 3.0: Yes, We Can Talk Empirical! In Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 359-377). Springer, Cham.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sinkovics, R.R., 2009. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Kirzner, I.M., 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of economic Literature, 35(1), pp.60-85.
Ko, S., 2004. Bisociation and opportunity. Information Age Pub.
Ko, S. and Butler, J.E., 2006. Prior knowledge, bisociative mode of thinking and entrepreneurial opportunity identification. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 3(1), pp.3-16.
Li, Y., Chen, H., Liu, Y. and Peng, M.W., 2014. Managerial ties, organizational learning, and opportunity capture: A social capital perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), pp.271-291.
Li, Y., Wang, P. and Liang, Y.J., 2015. Influence of entrepreneurial experience, alertness, and prior knowledge on opportunity recognition. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 43(9), pp.1575- 1583.
Lin, N., 2017. Building a network theory of social capital. In Social capital (pp. 3-28). Routledge. Ozgen, E., 2003. Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. Information Flow, Social, and cognitive perspective, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of NewYork.
Ozgen, E. and Baron, R.A., 2007. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of business venturing, 22(2), pp.174-192.
Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F., 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), pp.879-891.
Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Schlittgen, R. and Taylor, C.R., 2013. PLS path modeling and evolutionary segmentation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), pp.1318-1324.
Shane, S., 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization science, 11(4), pp.448-469.
Shane, S. and Nicolaou, N., 2015. Creative personality, opportunity recognition and the tendency to start businesses: A study of their genetic predispositions. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(3), pp.407-419.
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), pp.217-226.
Singh, R.P., 2001. A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), pp.10-12.
St-Jean, E., 2011. Mentor functions for novice entrepreneurs. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 17(1).
St-Jean, E. and Tremblay, M., 2011. Opportunity recognition for novice entrepreneurs: The benefits of learning with a mentor. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 17(2), pp.37-48.
Stam, W. and Elfring, T., 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extra industry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), pp.97-111.
Tang, J., Kacmar, K.M.M. and Busenitz, L., 2012. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), pp.77-94.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Wei Lee Lim, Mohar Yusof, Siri Roland Xavier, Leilanie Mohd Nor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by University Tun Abdul Razak (UNIRAZAK)
