The Impact of Digital Leadership on Employee Performance in Guangdong Civil Engineering Construction Enterprises The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety

Authors

  • Qihui Xie UNIRAZAK
  • Mui Yee Cheok UNIRAZAK

Keywords:

civil engineering construction, digital leadership, employee performance, Guangdong, psychological safety

Abstract

Digital transformation in civil engineering depends on technology adoption, leadership, and interpersonal conditions that allow employees to learn, speak up, and experiment. This study examines relationships among digital leadership, psychological safety, and employee performance in privately owned civil engineering construction enterprises in Guangdong Province, China. Drawing on Job Demands-Resources theory, it tests whether digital leadership is associated with performance directly and indirectly through psychological safety. A quantitative cross-sectional survey produced 484 valid responses. SPSS 29.0 supported preliminary screening and descriptive analysis, while SmartPLS 4.1 assessed the measurement and structural models using 5,000 bootstrap resamples. The measures demonstrated strong reliability and convergent validity: Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.926 to 0.933, composite reliability from 0.940 to 0.945, and average variance extracted from 0.612 to 0.694. Digital leadership was positively associated with psychological safety (beta = 0.276, p < .001) and employee performance (beta = 0.215, p < .001), while psychological safety was positively associated with employee performance (beta = 0.236, p < .001). The indirect effect through psychological safety was significant (beta = 0.065, p < .001), indicating partial mediation. Construction enterprises can improve digital-transformation outcomes by developing leaders who combine digital competence with empowerment, feedback, and non-punitive communication.

Author Biographies

Qihui Xie, UNIRAZAK

Digital transformation in civil engineering depends on technology adoption, leadership, and interpersonal conditions that allow employees to learn, speak up, and experiment. This study examines relationships among digital leadership, psychological safety, and employee performance in privately owned civil engineering construction enterprises in Guangdong Province, China. Drawing on Job Demands-Resources theory, it tests whether digital leadership is associated with performance directly and indirectly through psychological safety. A quantitative cross-sectional survey produced 484 valid responses. SPSS 29.0 supported preliminary screening and descriptive analysis, while SmartPLS 4.1 assessed the measurement and structural models using 5,000 bootstrap resamples. The measures demonstrated strong reliability and convergent validity: Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.926 to 0.933, composite reliability from 0.940 to 0.945, and average variance extracted from 0.612 to 0.694. Digital leadership was positively associated with psychological safety (beta = 0.276, p < .001) and employee performance (beta = 0.215, p < .001), while psychological safety was positively associated with employee performance (beta = 0.236, p < .001). The indirect effect through psychological safety was significant (beta = 0.065, p < .001), indicating partial mediation. Construction enterprises can improve digital-transformation outcomes by developing leaders who combine digital competence with empowerment, feedback, and non-punitive communication.

Mui Yee Cheok, UNIRAZAK

Digital transformation in civil engineering depends on technology adoption, leadership, and interpersonal conditions that allow employees to learn, speak up, and experiment. This study examines relationships among digital leadership, psychological safety, and employee performance in privately owned civil engineering construction enterprises in Guangdong Province, China. Drawing on Job Demands-Resources theory, it tests whether digital leadership is associated with performance directly and indirectly through psychological safety. A quantitative cross-sectional survey produced 484 valid responses. SPSS 29.0 supported preliminary screening and descriptive analysis, while SmartPLS 4.1 assessed the measurement and structural models using 5,000 bootstrap resamples. The measures demonstrated strong reliability and convergent validity: Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.926 to 0.933, composite reliability from 0.940 to 0.945, and average variance extracted from 0.612 to 0.694. Digital leadership was positively associated with psychological safety (beta = 0.276, p < .001) and employee performance (beta = 0.215, p < .001), while psychological safety was positively associated with employee performance (beta = 0.236, p < .001). The indirect effect through psychological safety was significant (beta = 0.065, p < .001), indicating partial mediation. Construction enterprises can improve digital-transformation outcomes by developing leaders who combine digital competence with empowerment, feedback, and non-punitive communication.

References

Bahadurzada, H., Edmondson, A. C., & Kerrissey, M. J. (2024). Psychological safety as an enduring resource amid constraints. International Journal of Public Health, 69, 1607332. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607332

Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job Demands-Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 34(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695

Claassen, K., Dos Anjos, D. R., Kettschau, J., & Broding, H. C. (2021). How to evaluate digital leadership: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 16(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00315-x

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley.

Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217

Gledson, B., Zulu, S. L., Saad, A. M., & Ponton, H. (2024). Digital leadership framework to support firm-level digital transformations for Construction 4.0. Construction Innovation, 24(1), 341-364.

Koh, R. J. (2018). The influence of transformational leadership on employee performance in the Singapore civil service [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Manchester.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Li, Z., Li, Z., & Zhou, X. (2024). The impact of middle managers' digital leadership on employee work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1422784.

Manoharan, K., Dissanayake, P. B. G., Pathirana, C., Deegahawature, D., & Silva, K. D. R. R. (2023). A labour performance score and grading system to the next normal practices in construction. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 13(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2022-0115

Nazzal, H. (2025). Strategic digital leadership in construction: Overcoming organizational barriers to sustainable competitiveness. International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 36(3), 71-80.

Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It's bad, it's complex, it's widespread, and it's not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17-61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030

Shao, Z., Li, X., Luo, Y., & Benitez, J. (2022). The differential impacts of top management support and transformational supervisory leadership on employees' digital performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(4), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2147880

Tariq, H., Pathirage, C., & Wanigarathena, I. (2024). The impact of mental health disorders and job demands on the individual job performance of construction workers. Journal of Occupational Health, 66(1), uiae060. https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae060

Tummers, L., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Leadership and Job Demands-Resources theory: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722080

Wang, K., Guo, F., Zhang, C., & Schaefer, D. (2024). From Industry 4.0 to Construction 4.0: Barriers to the digital transformation of engineering and construction sectors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(1), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2023-0509

Xia, N., Griffin, M. A., Xie, Q., & Hu, X. (2023). Antecedents of workplace safety behavior: Meta-analysis in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(4), Article 04023009. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12964

Zulu, S. L., Saad, A. M., Ajayi, S. O., Dulaimi, M., & Unuigbe, M. (2024). Digital leadership enactment in the construction industry: Barriers undermining effective transformation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(10), 4062-4078. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2023-0471

Downloads

Published

05-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles