Analysis Of Factors That Influence Higher Education Students On Using Internet In Sport Education

Authors

  • Yong Chen UNIRAZAK
  • Eng Kim Vincent Wee UNIRAZAK

Keywords:

Sports Education, Higher Education, Internet-based Learning, China

Abstract

The use of the internet in higher education has transformed the learning experience, including sports education. This study explores the key factors influencing higher education students’ adoption of internet-based learning for sports education in China. It examines students' perceptions, the impact of internet accessibility, the role of instructional design, and institutional support. Through a systematic literature review and qualitative methodology, the research identifies barriers such as digital literacy, connectivity issues, and student engagement. Findings suggest that while internet-based sports education enhances accessibility and flexibility, challenges such as technological infrastructure and instructor effectiveness need to be addressed. The study provides insights into improving digital sports education programs to enhance student satisfaction and learning outcomes.

Author Biographies

Yong Chen, UNIRAZAK

The use of the internet in higher education has transformed the learning experience, including sports education. This study explores the key factors influencing higher education students’ adoption of internet-based learning for sports education in China. It examines students' perceptions, the impact of internet accessibility, the role of instructional design, and institutional support. Through a systematic literature review and qualitative methodology, the research identifies barriers such as digital literacy, connectivity issues, and student engagement. Findings suggest that while internet-based sports education enhances accessibility and flexibility, challenges such as technological infrastructure and instructor effectiveness need to be addressed. The study provides insights into improving digital sports education programs to enhance student satisfaction and learning outcomes.

Eng Kim Vincent Wee, UNIRAZAK

The use of the internet in higher education has transformed the learning experience, including sports education. This study explores the key factors influencing higher education students’ adoption of internet-based learning for sports education in China. It examines students' perceptions, the impact of internet accessibility, the role of instructional design, and institutional support. Through a systematic literature review and qualitative methodology, the research identifies barriers such as digital literacy, connectivity issues, and student engagement. Findings suggest that while internet-based sports education enhances accessibility and flexibility, challenges such as technological infrastructure and instructor effectiveness need to be addressed. The study provides insights into improving digital sports education programs to enhance student satisfaction and learning outcomes.

References

Abdulazeez, D. A., Suleiman, O., & Yahaya, A. (2019). Impact of merger and acquisitions on the financial performance of deposit money banks in Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(4), 1-5. doi:10.4172/2223-5833.1000219

Anseel, F., Beatty, A., Shen, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. (2022). How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41, 318-348. doi:10.1177/0149206313484521

Arunruangsirilert, T., & Chonglerttam, S. (2021). Effect of corporate governance characteristics on strategic management accounting in Thailand. Asian Review of Accounting, 25, 85-105.doi:10.1108/ARA-11-2022-0107

Asante, J., Kissi, E., & Badu, E. (2021). Factorial analysis of capacity building needs of small and medium scale building contractors in developing countries. Ghana as a case study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25, 357-372. doi:10.1108/BIJ-07-2019-0117

Aslam, S., & Hasnu, S. A. F. (2019). Issues and constraints perceived by young entrepreneurs of Pakistan. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 50-65. doi:10.1108/WJEMSD-03-2022-0015

Bahri, M., St-Pierre, J., & Sakka, O. (2021). Performance measurement and management for manufacturing SMEs. Financial statement-based system. Measuring Business Excellence, 21, 17-36. doi:10.1108/MBE-06-2022-0034

Belás, J., Kljucnikov, A., Vojtovic, S., & Sobeková-Májková, M. (2022). Approach of the SME entrepreneurs to financial risk management in relation to gender and level of education. Economics & Sociology, 8(4), 32-42. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2022/8-4/2

Bonney, L., Collins, R., Miles, M. P., & Verreynne, M. (2021). A note on entrepreneurship as an alternative logic to address food security in the developing world. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 18(3), 1-20.doi:10.1142/S1084946713500167

Brown-Saracino, J. (2020). From methodological stumbles to substantive insights: Gaining ethnographic access in queer communities. Qualitative Sociology, 37, 43-68. doi:10.1007/s11133-013-9271-7

Cant, M. C., Erdis, C., & Sephapo, C. M. (2020). Business survival: The constraints experienced by South African SMEs in the financial sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4, 565-579. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i10/1255

Cowling, M., Liu, W., Ledger, A, & Zhang, N. (2022). What really happens to small and medium-sized enterprises in a global economic recession? UK evidence on sales and job dynamics. International Small Business Journal, 33, 488-513. doi:10.1177/0266242613512513

Damavanthi, S., Gamage, D., & Goonaratne, T. (2021). Management control in an apparel group. An institutional theory perspective. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18, 223-241. doi:10.1108/JAAR-09-2022-0075

Morse, J. (2022). Using qualitative methods to access the pain experience. British 282 Journal of Pain, 9, 26-31. doi:10.1177/2049463714550507

Mungal, A., & Garbharran, H.L. (2020). The perceptions of small businesses in the Implementation of cash management techniques. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(1), 75-83.

Munn, Z., Porritt, K., Lockwood, C., Aromataris, E., & Pearson, A. (2020). Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: The Conqual approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 1-7. doi:10.1186/1471228814108

Nielsen, S. (2021). Reflections in the applicability of business analysis for management accounting and future perspectives for the accountant. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 14, 167-187.doi:10.1108/JAOC-11-2020-0056

Nimon, K., Zientek, L. R., & Henson, R. K. (2022). The assumption of a reliable instrument and other pitfalls to avoid when considering the reliability of data. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1-39. doi:10.3389/fpsyq.2022.00102

Ofili, O. U. (2020). Challenges facing entrepreneurship in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management, 9, 1-17. doi:10.5539/ijbm. v9n12p258x

Olokoyo, F., Oyewo, B., & Babajide, A. (2020). The attitude of Investors to Capital and Money Market Investments Before and After Financial Crisis: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management, 3(1), 53-64.

Osano, H. M., & Languitone, H. (2019). Factors influencing access to finance by SMEs in Mozambique: Case of SMEs in Maputo central business district. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(13), 1-16. doi:10.1186/s13731-016-0041-0

Reynoso, C. F., Osuna, M. A. A., & Figueroa, L. E. O. (2020). Micro, small and mediumsized businesses in Jalisco: Their evolution, and strategic challenges. Review of Business & Finance Studies, 5(2), 27-43. Retrieved from http://www.theibfr.com/rbfcs.htm

Richardson, T. M., Earnhardt, M. P., & Marion, J. W. (2022). Is project management still an accidental profession. A qualitative study of career trajectory. Sage Open, 5, 1-10, doi:10.1177/2158244015572098

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2021). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25-35. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2086752

Thorpe, A. S. (2020). Doing the right thing or doing the thing right: Implications of participant withdrawal. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 255-277. doi:10.1177/1094428114524828

Tijani, O. M., & Mohammed, A. J. (2021). Computer-based accounting systems in small and medium enterprises: Empirical evidence from a randomized trial in Nigeria. Universal Journal of Management, 1, 13-21. doi:10.13189/ujm.2021.010103

Tobin, G. A. and Begley, C. M. (2004), Methodological rigor within a qualitative

framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388–396. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004. 03207.x

Tumele, S. (2022). Case study research. International Journal of Sales, Retailing, and Marketing, 4, 68-78. Retrieved from http://www.ijsrm.com/ijsrm/home.html

Turyahebwa, A., Sunday, A., & Ssekajugo, D. (2021). Financial management practices and business performance of small and medium enterprises in Western Uganda. African Journal of Business Management, 7, 3875-3885.

Waring, P., Vas, C., & Bali, A. S. (2021). The challenges of state intervention in

Singapore’s youth labour market. Equality Diversity and Inclusion. International Journal, 37, 138-150.doi:10.1108/EDI-10-2021-0211

Wisdom, J. P., Cavaleri, M. A., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Green, H. (2022). Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Services Research, 47, 721-745. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2020.01344.

Downloads

Published

29-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles