Lecturers’ Perception on the Effectiveness of Continuous Summative Assessment on Evaluating Grammar Skills among Undergraduates
Keywords:
Grammar, Lecturers, Perceptions, Summative Assessment, UndergraduateAbstract
Grammar can be classified as the most prominent element in the context of English Language. However, grammar has always been a problem among undergraduates. Although they are given a sufficient amount of input during schooling days, they stillface problems in using them. This is wholly because grammar instructions are not done in a continuous manner during their tertiary education. Many lecturers find it difficult in making sure undergraduates are able to utilize grammar in a propermanner regardless of assignments or presentations as English based subjects in tertiary education are only offered till the end of their first year. It is proposed that summative assessment should be conducted throughout the duration of study in their tertiary institution. This paper highlights the findings from an interview among 5 English lecturers who are currently serving in various private tertiary institutions. All respondents have 5 to 10 years of teaching experience in this field. The categories for the interview questions were built based on lecturers’ understanding on summative assessment and the needs in understanding grammar in using English. The findings indicate that lecturers are keen in having continuous summative assessments in evaluating grammar skills among undergraduates throughout their tertiary education.
References
Anas,L 2019. Study on the Effectiveness of Formative and Summative Assessment Techniques in Education. University of Sunderland
Arshad, A.S. and E. Nurusus, 2015. The influence of teaching experience, school location and academic background on teachers' beliefs in teaching grammar. Asian Social Science, 11(15): 257-266.
Clariana, R.B., D. Wagner and M.L.C. Roher, 2000. Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3): 5-21.
Corder, S.P., 1975. Error analysis, interlanguage and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 8(4): 201-218.
Din, M., 2007. English proficiency in Malaysia: Time for urgent action. Available from https://dinmerican.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/english- proficiency-in-malaysia-time-for-urgent- action/.
Drach, M., 1981. The creative aspect of Chomsky's use of the notion of creativity. Philosophical Review, 90(1): 44-65. Good, T.L., S.A. Grouws and H. Ebmeier, 1983. Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
Kulik, J.A. and C.C. Kulik, 1988. Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1): 79-97.
Mohammed, H. K., 2021 The Place of Grammar Instruction in the 21st century: Exploring Global Perspectives of English Teachers towards the role of teaching Grammar in ESL/EFL Classrooms. World Journal of English Language, Vol. 11, No. 1; 2021
Nurul A and Hanifah, D,A.,2021 Developing e-learning media in grammar instruction for beginner learners. Universitas KH.A Wahab Hasbullah doi: 10.21070/jees.v6i1.363
Nurusus, E., A.S. Arshad and Z.S.A.R. Sharifah, 2015. Exploring teachers beliefs in teaching grammar. English Teacher, 44(1): 23-32.
Slavin, R.E. and R.J. Steven, 1995. The cooperation elementary school: Effects on students’ achievement, attitudes and social relations.American Educational Research Journal, 32(2): 321-351.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Thilip Kumar Moorthy, Yogerisham Panir Silvam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by University Tun Abdul Razak (UNIRAZAK)