Venture Capital: A Systematic Literature Review
Keywords:
Venture capital, corporate innovation, business models, social capitalAbstract
Venture capital is an important financial element and has the natural attribute of supporting the real economy. As the venture capital industry continues to grow, they are now becoming an increasingly important support force in the capital markets. With the continuous development of venture capital, enterprise innovation also develops rapidly, which is similar to the growth trend of venture capital amount. Yet the areas of how do venture capital and enterprise innovation interact and influence each other have been mentioned by many researchers as ones that lack both consensus and devoted attention. The present paper aims to provide a detailed map of common and best practices in terms of venture capital and corporate innovation, and to explore whether they are related and how they influence each other to help extract best practices. in order to contribute to extracting best practice. This paper uses a systematic literature review (SLR) to help review the literature in a transparent and unbiased way. The review was guided by the PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis). Try to find more relevant and useful papers through three stages. The process ended with 118 articles divided into corporate innovation, business models, and social capital. The results show that both enterprise innovation and business model innovation have significant influence on venture capital intention. The two moderates each other's influence on venture capital intention, and the moderating effect of enterprise innovation is non-linear. With the continuous improvement of enterprise innovation, the influence of business model innovation on venture capital intention first increases and then decreases. Social capital plays an intermediary role in the influence of venture capital on enterprise innovation.
References
Alexander P, Peter R. (2012). Venture capital and patented innovation: evidence from Europe. Economic Policy, 447-482.
Bottazzi L, Da Rin M, Hellmann T. (2008). Who are the Active Investors? Evidence from Venture Capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3), 488-512.
Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, et al. (2018). How does Hedge Fund Activism Reshape Corporate Innovation?Journal of Financial Economics, 130(2), 237-264.
Brown, James R., Steven M. Fazzari and Bruce C. Petersen. (2009). Financing Innovation andGrowth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1),151-185
Barry C B. (1994). New direction in research on venture capital finance. Financial Management,23(3), 3-15.
Bayus B L, Erickson G, Jacobson R. (2003). The financial rewards of new product introductions in the personal computer industry. Management Science, 49(2), 197-210.
Baden-Fuller C, Haefliger S. (2013). Business Models and Technological Innovation. Long Range Planning, 46(6SI), 419-426.
Cumming D J, Macintosh J G. (2006). Crowding Out Private Equity: Canadian Evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 569-609.
Chemmanur T J, Loutskina E, Tian X. (2014). Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434-2473.
Cucculelli M, Bettinelli C. (2015). Business models, intangibles and firm performance: evidence on corporate entrepreneurship from Italian manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45(2SI), 329-350.
Calia R C, Guerrini F M, Mourac G L. (2007). Innovation Networks: from Technological Development to Business Model Reconfiguration. Technovation, 27(8), 426-432.
Dutta S, Folta T B. (2016). A Comparison of the Effect of Angels and Venture Capitalists on Innovation and Value Creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(1), 39-54.
Doganova L, Eyquem-Renault M. (2009). What do business models do? : Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559-1570.
Dirk Engela, Max Keilbachb. (2007). Firm-level implications of early stage venture capital investment-An empirical investigation. Journal of Empirical Finance, (2), 150-167.
Gary Dushnitskya, Michael J. Lenoxb. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, (NO.5), 615-639.
Hult G T M, Hurley R F, Knight G A. (2004). Innovativeness: its antecedents and impaction business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429-438.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chen Fei Fei, Cheok Mui Yee

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by University Tun Abdul Razak (UNIRAZAK)

